Re: RE24 testing call #3 (2.4.43) LMDB RE0.9 testing call #3 (0.9.17)

[Clément OUDOT <clement.oudot@savoirfairelinux.com>]

Le 11/11/2015 01:09, Howard Chu a écrit :
> Aaron Richton wrote:
> > On Tue, 10 Nov 2015, Cl?ment OUDOT wrote:
> >
> > > Could it be a problem on my build machine?
> >
> > Not directly IMO. Some (older?) pthreads implementations are
> > PTHREAD_MUTEX_ROBUST_NP, etc.
> >
> > one thing to try would be:
> >
> > #ifdef PTHREAD_MUTEX_ROBUST_NP
> > #define PTHREAD_MUTEX_ROBUST PTHREAD_MUTEX_ROBUST_NP
> > #define pthread_mutexattr_setrobust pthread_mutexattr_setrobust_np
> > #define pthread_mutex_consistent pthread_mutex_consistent_np
> > #endif
>
> Unfortunately, PTHREAD_MUTEX_ROBUST_NP is an enum, not a macro, so 
> #ifdef won't work to detect it.
>
> The attached patch should work. Please report back; I won't merge it 
> unless we know it actually helps.

Hello Howard,

I confirm the patch works for CentOS5/RHEL5 32 bits and 64 bits.

I can build without the patch on CentOS 6.



I can now take my plane for LDAPCon ;) See you soon.

--
Clément OUDOT
Consultant en logiciels libres, Expert infrastructure et sécurité
Savoir-faire Linux