Re: Question regarding MDB_NOLOCK

To: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>
Subject: Re: Question regarding MDB_NOLOCK
From: David Barbour <dmbarbour@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 21:44:39 -0600
Cc: Hallvard Breien Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no>, OpenLDAP Devel <openldap-devel@openldap.org>
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=RBcRQN1HRk0bpeHR1s4Et28xjRvmAJfB4FPYiu/n/kE=; b=zLhV7GDMTj1LvLmtRqfeW3/yGMHgSRXR8/M1FrioMxNVosXb0r3wKAtLx16PfHnYiS KSD6poFrOTmqVjkYBzlf1gvQd8HTYT1zgFmFp8psrc2rMDzbr1IrzW/fRNwg8irHphWH ZarcrnXQpgF7H29ZvWss86hCvAVp8Zl/UOcoasPvgY7WMq7qROLDmMpaqnGokXGdMZVL poZqerBuaBQ9YHAlIe/Iv7cFz4dpkNMN5aQQOvyq9Mtsveu2ZNeFWlTrt/FmQHtWLm56 I0JgrvjyMbbZdwHTP1pFYIpZeCfe6PQZz1PbfAK0AtJqu4vkaBnqX4yzsHrBvz8KdKpT 7sVQ==
In-reply-to: <54CC2024.8090000@symas.com>
References: <CAAOQMSvoHLLH==PgjiQ_RQvfWQ265MCFC3SU2x+FQEcm8fWTQg@mail.gmail.com> <547C654E.8080300@usit.uio.no> <CAAOQMSt2M0XDW=BrNdcSiEgGV4xGDJWZxSh_5QJW6HS7jNYEBg@mail.gmail.com> <CAAOQMSt+QSCJFrrsL0Ta3N-UiTkrziCpTLPG1LcW3_hf+P1sSQ@mail.gmail.com> <54CC2024.8090000@symas.com>

On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 6:21 PM, Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com> wrote:

That is supposed to be its current behavior already. I.e., no page that either of the two meta pages points to is ever allowed to be reclaimed.

Okay then. On Monday, I'll see if I can write a test demonstrating this bug. And, if so, a patch to fix it.

References:
- Re: Question regarding MDB_NOLOCK
  - From: David Barbour <dmbarbour@gmail.com>
- Re: Question regarding MDB_NOLOCK
  - From: David Barbour <dmbarbour@gmail.com>
- Re: Question regarding MDB_NOLOCK
  - From: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>