[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Don't Use Copy Control (1.3.6.1.4.1.4203.666.5.15 vs. 1.3.6.1.1.22)

To: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>, openldap-devel@OpenLDAP.org
Subject: Re: Don't Use Copy Control (1.3.6.1.4.1.4203.666.5.15 vs. 1.3.6.1.1.22)
From: Michael Ströder <michael@stroeder.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 22:27:47 +0200
In-reply-to: <5421D704.8050206@symas.com>
References: <541FB7E3.7090207@stroeder.com> <5421D5D1.20101@stroeder.com> <5421D704.8050206@symas.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:29.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/29.0 SeaMonkey/2.26.1

Howard Chu wrote:
> Michael Ströder wrote:
>> Michael Ströder wrote:
>>> Is there any issue with using OID 1.3.6.1.1.22 as controlType for Don't Use
>>> Copy Control as defined in RFC 6171? Currently an experimental OpenLDAP .666
>>> OID s used which makes this control rather unusable outside OpenLDAP
>>> implementation.
> 
> It's been 1.3.6.1.1.22 in git master since 2011. The change will be in 2.5.
> 2.4 releases are ended as of 2.4.40.

Why not in 2.4? RFC 6171 was published three years ago on Standards Track.

Ciao, Michael.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Don't Use Copy Control (1.3.6.1.4.1.4203.666.5.15 vs. 1.3.6.1.1.22)
  - From: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>

References:
- Don't Use Copy Control (1.3.6.1.4.1.4203.666.5.15 vs. 1.3.6.1.1.22)
  - From: Michael Ströder <michael@stroeder.com>
- Re: Don't Use Copy Control (1.3.6.1.4.1.4203.666.5.15 vs. 1.3.6.1.1.22)
  - From: Michael Ströder <michael@stroeder.com>
- Re: Don't Use Copy Control (1.3.6.1.4.1.4203.666.5.15 vs. 1.3.6.1.1.22)
  - From: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Don't Use Copy Control (1.3.6.1.4.1.4203.666.5.15 vs. 1.3.6.1.1.22)
Next by Date: Re: Don't Use Copy Control (1.3.6.1.4.1.4203.666.5.15 vs. 1.3.6.1.1.22)
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread