[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: RE 24 testing call (OL 2.4.25)
- To: openldap-devel@openldap.org
- Subject: Re: RE 24 testing call (OL 2.4.25)
- From: Xin LI <delphij@delphij.net>
- Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 13:01:01 -0700
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=default; d=delphij.net; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:organization:user-agent: mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:openpgp: content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=KihQPz9pmoR3x7teqBo6AvFor7wvXfudDPyoG0A3FZ+9K9RA00fwJtbyAy1ZMxS8j K+4gR/AMoWSFevjx6QgsQ==
- In-reply-to: <87CA20EB6343DDC272A1CE73@[192.168.1.2]>
- Openpgp: id=3FCA37C1; url=http://www.delphij.net/delphij.asc
- Organization: The FreeBSD Project
- References: <87CA20EB6343DDC272A1CE73@[192.168.1.2]>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110317 Thunderbird/3.1.9 ThunderBrowse/3.3.5
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Tests succeeded on FreeBSD/amd64 9-CURRENT.
By the way, can we consider releasing the tarball with some modern
compressor, for example xz or bzip2?
I have done some test on FreeBSD, with a simple gunzip/xz -9e cycle, the
size reduced from 5240643 to 3439792 (34% smaller).
A gunzip/bzip -9 cycle would reduce the file to 4227655 bytes (20% smaller).
It seems to be worthy for the 20% (if we use bzip2) or 34% (if we use
xz) bandwidth saving I think.
Cheers,
- --
Xin LI <delphij@delphij.net> http://www.delphij.net/
FreeBSD - The Power to Serve! Live free or die
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (FreeBSD)
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJNjPR9AAoJEATO+BI/yjfBYuAIAMKQYeSwvbv+23VM6Qvl18B2
sadvGOmyvFtGBQ9mJiyK6AHbMpnvAJqUxhAaMKw+ltkIZSLsU+SG4kVG5UrHfhYJ
UeH0LI6Eq7+DFElr9f9Pd/HZguM+/qjLUQflnpD7QsaPZaaWWJXMcikbV3/QIdIz
uq2/J/z+KpJeB5zn/Bkystr890FxuaeICr9SugFTG4U15G7QRpVMXRLSoqABomJw
ZhhFpW3BhIRYZO9LtY9n8TOFzWCiO5dfku6fKZoOaekeC/pc9/hHQB/aYHWS0Olt
kjYWBBuWsID3VkngsMLmXrKSwXC6qnCxz9uqjsFjiy9lnVwFLIK62Ik/LEBOfIk=
=hYVP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----