[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: LDAP Transactions RFC alignment

To: Daniel Otero <daniel.otero@ericsson.com>
Subject: Re: LDAP Transactions RFC alignment
From: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 09:54:46 -0800
Cc: "openldap-devel@openldap.org" <openldap-devel@openldap.org>
In-reply-to: <4CF6C3661437FF41AEBC0094A81F0F460665F68279@ESESSCMS0356.eemea.ericsson.se>
References: <4CF6C3661437FF41AEBC0094A81F0F460665F68279@ESESSCMS0356.eemea.ericsson.se>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:2.0b11pre) Gecko/20110130 Firefox/4.0b11pre SeaMonkey/2.1b2pre

Daniel Otero wrote:

Hi,
I'm interested in implementing LDAP Transactions as specified in RFC 5805.
I've checked there is something implemented in the client side, slapd and
back-bdb dated in 2006, as the RFC is of March 2010 I would like to know how
aligned is the current implementation in branch 2.4 with regards the RFC 5805.
I also use the back-meta to proxy to remote LDAP servers, AFAIK currently
there is no support for LDAP transactions in back-meta. Is there any plan to
extend the back-meta with support for LDAP transactions?
Regards
/Dani

I don't believe the RFC has changed much since the last draft. Transactionsupport in slapd was never completed, the code in back-bdb is simply stubs.


--
  -- Howard Chu
  CTO, Symas Corp.           http://www.symas.com
  Director, Highland Sun     http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
  Chief Architect, OpenLDAP  http://www.openldap.org/project/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: LDAP Transactions RFC alignment
  - From: masarati@aero.polimi.it

References:
- LDAP Transactions RFC alignment
  - From: Daniel Otero <daniel.otero@ericsson.com>

Prev by Date: LDAP Transactions RFC alignment
Next by Date: Re: LDAP Transactions RFC alignment
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread