[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: LDIF wrapping (Was: ITS#6645)
> Howard Chu wrote:
>> email@example.com wrote:
>>> I'd like to resolve the ITS#6645 issue, either by committing or wiping
>>> this patch from my working directory, as it conflicts with ITS#6737.
>> At this point I'm OK with anything that makes this ITS go away.
> PS: Might as well add the feature to ldapsearch too, and close ITS#6149
> any others.
Fine; what option do you suggest? perhaps -L with an argument indicating
columns number; I vaguely remember that optional values are a GNU