[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: libldap_r

Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com> writes:

> The benefit is decreasing the number of libraries that need to be
> maintained, and eliminating the conflict when code linked against one
> library is dynamically loaded into a process that was already linked
> with the other.

Indeed, Debian has been trying to use only libldap_r for some time because
of the latter issue, and we would love to throw out the way we're handling
that in favor of adopting a maintained and supported build configuration.

Russ Allbery (rra@stanford.edu)             <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>