[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: FAQ and ancient entries

On 14/08/2009 17:44, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
--On Thursday, August 13, 2009 12:01 PM +0100 Gavin Henry
<ghenry@suretecsystems.com> wrote:

----- "Michael Ströder" <michael@stroeder.com> wrote:

Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> In looking at our FAQ, many entries detail ancient (2.1 and
> information that is completely obsolete. It would be nice to be
able to
> archive off the cruft so that the site is actually of more use.
> Thoughts on how best to achieve this?

Do we really need this ancient stuff to be archived? Many snippets are
not of
such a good quality which would justify the effort needed to maintain
an archive.

Ciao, Michael.

It's not supported by the project I think, so should be just deleted.

Anyone else have an opinion?

Actually, I find this information useful once in a while, when having to debug ancient installations. There are still many out there, unfortunately... (and of course, I'm too "new" to know how things used to work before 2.2)

Maybe a category could be created, named "Historical", and all the old entries placed within?