[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: FAQ and ancient entries
On 14/08/2009 17:44, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
--On Thursday, August 13, 2009 12:01 PM +0100 Gavin Henry
----- "Michael Ströder" <email@example.com> wrote:
Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> In looking at our FAQ, many entries detail ancient (2.1 and
> information that is completely obsolete. It would be nice to be
> archive off the cruft so that the site is actually of more use.
> Thoughts on how best to achieve this?
Do we really need this ancient stuff to be archived? Many snippets are
such a good quality which would justify the effort needed to maintain
It's not supported by the project I think, so should be just deleted.
Anyone else have an opinion?
Actually, I find this information useful once in a while, when having to
debug ancient installations. There are still many out there,
unfortunately... (and of course, I'm too "new" to know how things used
to work before 2.2)
Maybe a category could be created, named "Historical", and all the old
entries placed within?