[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: Please test RE24 (3/18/2009 call for testing)
--On Thursday, March 19, 2009 11:12 AM -0700 Howard Chu <email@example.com>
Aaron Richton wrote:
Is something improperly ordered during teardowns?
 ldap_pvt_thread_pool_destroy(tpool = 0x39c374, run_pending = 1),
line 570 in "tpool.c"
Same issue we ran into earlier, the consumer info has been freed but
there's still a consumer task queued in the thread pool. I had already
changed things around to avoid this but obviously haven't totally
prevented it. Should be fixed now in HEAD.
This is now in RE24 as well. Updated testing results welcomed.
Principal Software Engineer
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration