[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: slapd.conf vs slapd.d in the docs

To: OpenLDAP Devel <openldap-devel@openldap.org>
Subject: Re: slapd.conf vs slapd.d in the docs
From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 09:09:21 -0800
Content-disposition: inline
In-reply-to: <1897317.01231751664769.JavaMail.root@mail>
References: <1897317.01231751664769.JavaMail.root@mail>

--On Monday, January 12, 2009 9:14 AM +0000 Gavin Henry <ghenry@OpenLDAP.org> wrote:

OK, thanks. Dev team thoughts?

I found the doc examples using the LDIF format quite useful when transitioning from the *.conf format to the config format, regardless of the ability to take a slapd.conf and translate it to LDIF. People who are starting fresh may never need/desire to have a *.conf file.

--Quanah

--

Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Engineer
Zimbra, Inc
--------------------
Zimbra ::  the leader in open source messaging and collaboration

Follow-Ups:
- Re: slapd.conf vs slapd.d in the docs
  - From: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>

References:
- Re: slapd.conf vs slapd.d in the docs
  - From: Gavin Henry <ghenry@OpenLDAP.org>

Prev by Date: Re: slapd.conf vs slapd.d in the docs
Next by Date: Re: slapd.conf vs slapd.d in the docs
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread