[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: slapadd performance degradation from 2.3.43 to 2.4.12
Philip Guenther wrote:
On Fri, 21 Nov 2008, Howard Chu wrote:
Something else came to mind. The trickle_task obviously cannot increase
the overall volume of I/O, so there's no good reason for it to make
things more than twice as slow.
Really? Why can't a DB page be modified, written out by memp_trickle(),
modified again, and then written out by txn_checkpoint()?
Because we're talking about slapadd here, and it doesn't work that way.
-- Howard Chu
CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com
Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/