[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: Please test RE24
Howard Chu wrote:
Pierangelo Masarati wrote:
----- Howard Chu<firstname.lastname@example.org> ha scritto:
I see that on server6, but server5 is correct. Also there appears to be an
erroneous rename in server6.
Actually, I have been unable to reproduce this issue. To summarize: so
far, I only got a failure of test019 with re24& db-4.7; no failures for
re24& db-4.6, so I believe the db version could be unrelated, as the issue
does not seem to be repeatable here. I'll keep trying and investigating.
In fact, the failure I saw, related to a non-propagated delete, seems also
to occur in other tests I'm carving for HEAD, but does not show up in
test050 as I modified by adding an add and a delete for each participant in
the MMR pool.
I've definitely identified a bug in rename handling, working on a fix. The
detection of deleteOldRDN is wrong, it always results in deleteOldRDN being
set even if the old RDN wasn't actually deleted. There are some other problems
due to modRDN falling thru to modify as well...
This is now fixed in HEAD.
-- Howard Chu
CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com
Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/