[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: postalAddress matching rule
Brett @Google wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 7:03 PM, Michael Ströder <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> slapo-collect should intercept the write request and forbid the write access
>> if the attribute type is declared with COLLECTIVE.
> Yep. That sounds reasonable, but i presume it should either return an
> unwilling to perform, or silently ignore it.
I'd prefer to not silently ignore it since returning unwillingToPerform
clearly indicates that a client is misbehaving which needs correction.
> The latter case would be
> better if dumping out a ldap database (as it would be dumped as a
> "real" attribute) and then wanting to import that same data back ?
slapadd is a completely different use-case anyway because operational
attributes are also imported.