[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: back-bdb flaw
Howard Chu writes:
> Considering that back-hdb and back-bdb share 90% of their code, I
> don't see any immediate impact from this decision. Even going thru
> and deleting/moving the files in CVS is more trouble than it's worth.
If so, the version (RE25?) which removes back-bdb can rename the "hdb"
backend to "bdb", maybe leaving "hdb" as an alias to be removed later.
They are similar enough that this should not cause confusion. slapcat -
slapadd will be required to upgrade, but that's required anyway between
What advantages do bdb still have over hdb today? Only that it's more
used and thus somewhat better tested?