[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: Performance issue with In-Memory BDB
<quote who="Suhel Momin">
> I have made changes such that backend BDB ( ver 4.5 ) resides in
> instead of on disk . This is with default slapd configuration.
> I was hoping to have a better performance with this. But what I now see is
> that do_add takes much more time then what it use to take when BDB was
> on-Disk. Indexing is done on objectclass in both the cases.
> Any pointers on why this could be an issue?
This should be a openldap-software e-mail.
What are your changes?