[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: SDF (Was: [Please Authorise] Permission to use your glossary as a starting point for OpenLDAP docs addition?)
<quote who="Kurt D. Zeilenga">
> At 03:04 AM 12/8/2006, Gavin Henry wrote:
>>Are we concerned with the sdf format in anyway?
> About the format, no.
>>Is it still maintained?
> Not actively.
>>Can we do everything we want with it?
> No. But s/want/need/, then yes.
>>But I have absolutely no objections to sticking with sdf.
> For now, sticking with SDF is best. But after we
> upgrade some more critical pieces of infrastructure,
> like the issue tracker and FAQ, we can come back to
Great, as I thought.