[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: SDF (Was: [Please Authorise] Permission to use your glossary as a starting point for OpenLDAP docs addition?)



<quote who="Kurt D. Zeilenga">
> At 03:04 AM 12/8/2006, Gavin Henry wrote:
>>Are we concerned with the sdf format in anyway?
>
> About the format, no.
>
>>Is it still maintained?
>
> Not actively.
>
>>Can we do everything we want with it?
>
> No.  But s/want/need/, then yes.
>
>>But I have absolutely no objections to sticking with sdf.
>
> For now, sticking with SDF is best.  But after we
> upgrade some more critical pieces of infrastructure,
> like the issue tracker and FAQ, we can come back to
> this.

Great, as I thought.

Gavin.

>
> Kurt
>
>