[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: commit: ldap/servers/slapd/back-ldap monitor.c Makefile.in init.c

Pierangelo Masarati wrote:
Howard Chu wrote:
Hm, test034-translucent is failing now, complaining at register time. The local slapd.2.log:
@(#) $OpenLDAP: slapd 2.X (Sep 14 2006 11:59:20) $
hyc@mandolin:/home/hyc/OD/hobj/servers/slapd
bdb_db_open: Warning - No DB_CONFIG file found in directory ./testrun/db.2.a: (2)
Expect poor performance for suffix o=translucent.
monitor_back_register_entry_parent(""): base="cn=databases,cn=monitor" scope=3 filter="(&(monitoredInfo=ldap)(!(monitorOverlay=ldap))(namingContexts:distinguishedNameMatch:=o=translucent))": unable to find entry
backend_startup_one: bi_db_open failed! (-1)
backend_startup_one: bi_db_open failed! (-1)
slapd stopped.
connections_destroy: nothing to destroy.

I'll see if I can sort it out...
I already fixed that once; apparently I'm either still missing some commits, or we have something different. Note that back-ldap here should not inherit
monitoring stuff from the underlying database; specific monitoring should be disabled (that was my intention) since it's not working the way it should right now.

Oh, maybe a false alarm then. I have some revised filter code in my tree at the moment, it's probably broken somewhere. (Was working on ITS#3707 features...) I'll try again with a clean source tree.

Basically, the reason I'm appending an entry below that of the database, instead of adding to the database's entry, is because in some cases, e.g. slapo-chain(5), we want more than one target, with specific URI, stuff and cached connections, to be monitored simultaneously. That's why "cn=Connections" is the default RDN, but slapo-chain(5), for instance, customizes the RDN of the children entries it adds. 

--
  -- Howard Chu
  Chief Architect, Symas Corp.  http://www.symas.com
  Director, Highland Sun        http://highlandsun.com/hyc
  OpenLDAP Core Team            http://www.openldap.org/project/