[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: Disabling schema checking in slapadd
At 10:32 AM 1/8/2006, Luke Howard wrote:
>>This won't allow required attributes to be missing.
>>I would suggest tombstones have objectClass
>>and this allow/require those few attributes not stripped.
>But would prefer not to change structural object class so that
>tombstones can be reanimated...
How do you reanimate if you deleted many of the attributes?
>Also, because the structural
>object class cannot be changed it is difficult to do this
See the 'glue' object implementation.
>Or are you suggesting make tombstone a special-cased auxiliary
>class handled by slapd?
No. I was thinking that tombstones could be implemented
much the way glue objects are implemented.
I note I don't have much problem with adding a no-schemachecking
option to slapadd, as this might also be useful in reloading
of partial (especially fractional) replicas from their slapcat