[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: LDAP Debug messages & severity levels



Sounds reasonable... -Kdz
At 10:49 AM 12/22/2005, Pierangelo Masarati wrote:
>On Thu, 2005-12-22 at 09:33 -0800, Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote:
>> At 04:37 AM 12/22/2005, Pierangelo Masarati wrote:
>> >In my design, the
>> >infrastructure to support it will be very light; moreover, there will be
>> >no need to change __all__ statements: on the contrary, existing Debug()
>> >statements would just have a neutral, default behavior; this means no
>> >#ifdefs, no NEW_LOGGING style intrusivity and so. 
>> 
>> I note that I think it would be fine for a new logging system
>> to require all existing Debug statements to be rewritten
>> as long as:
>>         a) the rewrite work can be automated
>>         b) new statements would work with both old logging
>>         and new logging
>>         c) switching between new and old logging would
>>         be a simple matter (such as defining some macro).
>> 
>> That is, I have no problem doing something like:
>>         %s/Debug\(/Log\( defaultSeverity,/g
>
>My idea is to
>
>#ifdef OLD_LOGGING
>#define Debug(/* as before */)
>#else
>#define Debug(l,f,a1,a2,a3) Log(l,defaultSeverity,f,a1,a2,a3)
>#endif
>
>so no commits will ever be required for those messages we don't urge to
>provide a specific severity.
>
>> 
>> where Log was defined to expand to a Debug statement if
>> using old logging and used directly in new logging.
>> 
>> I certainly do not want to see #ifdef NEW_LOGGING spewed
>> throughout the code again.
>
>that's precisely my intention :)  since I need this quite soon, the
>least code gets touched, and the least intrusive the change is, the
>better.
>
>> 
>> > I haven't yet considered the implications of --disable-debug, though.
>> 
>> Long term, I rather this either completely go away or
>> logging statements below some severity level be put
>> behind #ifdef LDAP_DEBUG or the like.
>
>I think any decision we take with respect to that will fit in my scheme
>as soon as we start moving to the new scheme calls with higher severity;
>in that case it would be trivial to define the new calls to be always
>on, while turning the calls to Debug() to nothing.
>
>p.
>
>
>
>
>Ing. Pierangelo Masarati
>Responsabile Open Solution
>OpenLDAP Core Team
>
>SysNet s.n.c.
>Via Dossi, 8 - 27100 Pavia - ITALIA
>http://www.sys-net.it
>------------------------------------------
>Office:   +39.02.23998309          
>Mobile:   +39.333.4963172
>Email:    pierangelo.masarati@sys-net.it
>------------------------------------------