[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: rename across trees: manageDIT?

At 11:19 AM 8/17/2005, Pierangelo Masarati wrote:
>Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote:
>>In absence of a chaining operation (which would allow cooperating
>>DSAs to, if they were willing and able, subtree renames), I see
>>no problem with proxy backends making things work using manageDIT,
>>manageDSAit, proxyAuthz, and other controls.   The problem, of
>>course, is that the client itself might have provided those controls
>>and it might be difficult (if not impossible), especially in the
>>remote server, to distinguish the cases.  Hence, why a chaining
>>operation is badly needed.
>By the way, shouldn't entryUUID, entryCSN be SLAP_AT_MANAGEABLE as well?

entryUUID is likely managable, entryCSN not!   Even on a mangedDIT
change, entryCSN must be updated otherwise replication won't work