[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Feature request: multimaster

To: David Boreham <david_list@boreham.org>
Subject: Re: Feature request: multimaster
From: Pierangelo Masarati <ando@sys-net.it>
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 15:45:45 +0100
Cc: openldap-devel <openldap-devel@OpenLDAP.org>
References: <41FB67EA.4080903@sys-net.it> <077f01c5060f$1a3c6950$fb529145@mtbrook.bozemanpass.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20021003

David Boreham wrote:

This is not multimaster: it's single (floating) master.

Well, since the term "multimaster" has been abused so many times for such a long time, let me abuse it a little bit as well ;) Yes, it's floating master, and I think it's the most reasonable thing we may need/want to implement now.

p.

   SysNet - via Dossi,8 27100 Pavia Tel: +390382573859 Fax: +390382476497

References:
- Feature request: multimaster
  - From: Pierangelo Masarati <ando@sys-net.it>
- Re: Feature request: multimaster
  - From: "David Boreham" <david_list@boreham.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Run-time registered controls
Next by Date: Controls inheritance in the glue overlay (Was: Syncrepl of portions of glued database)
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread