[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: dropping back-ldbm (was: commit: ldap/servers/slapd connection.c)

To: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@stanford.edu>
Subject: Re: dropping back-ldbm (was: commit: ldap/servers/slapd connection.c)
From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 16:19:07 -0800
Cc: openldap-devel@OpenLDAP.org
In-reply-to: <6121E9D2E86512DB0B9E79C7@cadabra-dsl.stanford.edu>
References: <200501140108.j0E182si091234@cantor.openldap.org> <41E7ED9D.6060008@symas.com> <6559C0A39DD8CD48BEFEA72D@cadabra-dsl.stanford.edu> <37820.131.175.154.56.1105950065.squirrel@131.175.154.56> <hbf.20050119pl1z@bombur.uio.no> <6121E9D2E86512DB0B9E79C7@cadabra-dsl.stanford.edu>

At 03:34 PM 1/20/2005, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
>at what point does OL evaluate deprecated features for exclusion in new releases? 

In general, we drop code when it shows significant signs
of bit rot.  As back-ldbm is presently being actively
maintained by community members, under the current
practices, it stays.

Kurt

References:
- Re: commit: ldap/servers/slapd connection.c
  - From: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>
- Re: commit: ldap/servers/slapd connection.c
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@stanford.edu>
- Re: commit: ldap/servers/slapd connection.c
  - From: "Pierangelo Masarati" <ando@sys-net.it>
- dropping back-ldbm (was: commit: ldap/servers/slapd connection.c)
  - From: Hallvard B Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no>
- Re: dropping back-ldbm (was: commit: ldap/servers/slapd connection.c)
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@stanford.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: dropping back-ldbm (was: commit: ldap/servers/slapd connection.c)
Next by Date: Re: dropping back-ldbm (was: commit: ldap/servers/slapd connection.c)
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread