[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: what if we move SLAPI to a (global) overlay?

To: ando@sys-net.it
Subject: Re: what if we move SLAPI to a (global) overlay?
From: Luke Howard <lukeh@padl.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2004 13:00:15 +1100
Cc: hyc@symas.com, openldap-devel@OpenLDAP.org
Organization: PADL Software Pty Ltd
References: <41BACCD9.8080703@sys-net.it> <41BB4187.5000208@symas.com> <3842.151.29.208.172.1102798128.squirrel@151.29.208.172>
Versions: dmail (bsd44) 2.6d/makemail 2.10

I agree it's a good idea. Because we are very dependent on SLAPI I'd be
happy to work with you to ensure there are no regressions.

SLAPI has much subtle and undocumented behaviour :-)

-- Luke

--

Follow-Ups:
- Re: what if we move SLAPI to a (global) overlay?
  - From: Pierangelo Masarati <ando@sys-net.it>

References:
- what if we move SLAPI to a (global) overlay?
  - From: Pierangelo Masarati <ando@sys-net.it>
- Re: what if we move SLAPI to a (global) overlay?
  - From: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>
- Re: what if we move SLAPI to a (global) overlay?
  - From: "Pierangelo Masarati" <ando@sys-net.it>

Prev by Date: Re: what if we move SLAPI to a (global) overlay?
Next by Date: Re: what if we move SLAPI to a (global) overlay?
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread