[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: breaking up slap_init_user() for better chroot functionality

To: Daniel Ott <dott@ncchristian.org>
Subject: Re: breaking up slap_init_user() for better chroot functionality
From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 08:48:13 -0700
Cc: OpenLDAP-devel@OpenLDAP.org
In-reply-to: <416BF106.5020008@ncchristian.org>
References: <416B2F4F.3010606@ncchristian.org> <6.1.2.0.0.20041011194512.02d3b0d8@127.0.0.1> <416BF106.5020008@ncchristian.org>

At 07:58 AM 10/12/2004, Daniel Ott wrote:
>Why do you think the suggested split would change command line semantics?

Because the modifications would change the password
database requirements.

Kurt

Follow-Ups:
- Re: breaking up slap_init_user() for better chroot functionality
  - From: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>

References:
- breaking up slap_init_user() for better chroot functionality
  - From: Daniel Ott <dott@ncchristian.org>
- Re: breaking up slap_init_user() for better chroot functionality
  - From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
- Re: breaking up slap_init_user() for better chroot functionality
  - From: Daniel Ott <dott@ncchristian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: breaking up slap_init_user() for better chroot functionality
Next by Date: Re: breaking up slap_init_user() for better chroot functionality
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread