[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: sasl-regexp proper behavior?
The mapping is not necessarily one-to-one, it's can be many-to-one.
sasl-regexp(a) -> X and sasl-regexp(b) -> X is fine, but
sasl-regexp(c) -> X,Y is invalid.
At 09:52 AM 3/24/2004, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
>I recently had bad data in my directory (oops) that had would return 2 results to the sasl-regexp query for what bind DN to map a user to.
>Other than this being a shot myself in the foot scenario, I'm curious about:
>What is the current behavior when this happens? Would the entity get assigned the first DN returned?
>What should the correct behavior be? From the literature, sasl-regexp should be a 1-1 mapping. So in a case like this when two results are returned, should the entity be mapped to a DN at all? Or would it be better to return an error?
>Principal Software Developer
>GnuPG Public Key: http://www.stanford.edu/~quanah/pgp.html