[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: LDAP_DEPRECATED in OPENLDAP_REL_ENG_2_2
Luke Howard writes:
>> No problem in keeping them around, but if you're concerned
>> with, say, performance or so, then remember that the simpler
>> API will always be implemented as a wrapper around the most
>> complete one.
> Surely, though, the overhead of a function call is negligible
> in comparison with any network traffic?
I would think so. Negligible in comparison to the function bodies of
most of the wrapped-around functions too. Maybe except the extra
debugging statements. If so, maybe those should be removed from the