[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: saslAuthz{To|From}

To: "Randall S. Winchester" <rsw@sendmail.com>
Subject: Re: saslAuthz{To|From}
From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 08:19:10 -0800
Cc: Pierangelo Masarati <ando@sys-net.it>, openldap-devel@OpenLDAP.org
In-reply-to: <Pine.WNT.4.58.0312130731280.684@rswCPxW2K.smi.sendmail.com >
References: <3FDAF876.2000903@sys-net.it> <3FDB1E01.3080208@sys-net.it> <6.0.0.22.0.20031213064531.04227d60@127.0.0.1> <Pine.WNT.4.58.0312130731280.684@rswCPxW2K.smi.sendmail.com>

At 07:58 AM 12/13/2003, Randall S. Winchester wrote:
>My comment would be that for a multi-domain site, a uid can include a
>FQDN, like u:jane@janedoe.com.

Which is precisely why using @ as a realm separator is a bad idea.
We need to support the userid "jane@janedoe.com" existing in multiple
realms.

Kurt

Follow-Ups:
- Re: saslAuthz{To|From}
  - From: Pierangelo Masarati <ando@sys-net.it>

References:
- saslAuthz{To|From}
  - From: Pierangelo Masarati <ando@sys-net.it>
- Re: saslAuthz{To|From}
  - From: Pierangelo Masarati <ando@sys-net.it>
- Re: saslAuthz{To|From}
  - From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
- Re: saslAuthz{To|From}
  - From: "Randall S. Winchester" <rsw@sendmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: saslAuthz{To|From}
Next by Date: Re: saslAuthz{To|From}
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread