[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

RE: Thread-local malloc discussion summary

To: <lukeh@PADL.COM>
Subject: RE: Thread-local malloc discussion summary
From: "Howard Chu" <hyc@highlandsun.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2003 21:20:24 -0700
Cc: <jongchoi@us.ibm.com>, <openldap-devel@OpenLDAP.org>
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <200304100120.LAA14459@au.padl.com>

So I take it you're in favor of exploring in this direction...

  -- Howard Chu
  Chief Architect, Symas Corp.       Director, Highland Sun
  http://www.symas.com               http://highlandsun.com/hyc
  Symas: Premier OpenSource Development and Support 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Luke Howard [mailto:lukeh@PADL.COM]
 
> I know I've pointed this out many times before, but it is interesting
> to note that one of the larger differences between two major versions
> of a well-known UMich-derived LDAP server was switching to a third-
> party, multi-threaded malloc library.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Thread-local malloc discussion summary
  - From: Ganesan R <rganesan-ldap@myrealbox.com>

References:
- RE: Thread-local malloc discussion summary
  - From: Luke Howard <lukeh@PADL.COM>

Prev by Date: Re: Thread-local malloc discussion summary
Next by Date: Re: Thread-local malloc discussion summary
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread