[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: openldap-2.1.16: what happened to cache.c?

At 06:50 AM 3/28/2003, Roland Bauerschmidt wrote:
>Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote:
>> At this point, I see little reason to revert (given the routines have
>> long been broken and hence deprecated).
>Even though that might be true, applications using it will break when
>libldap is upgraded, although they shouldn't as the SO name didn't

yes, broken applications will break further.

> Shouldn't it be bumped then?

I care more that non-broken applications will automatically
pick up important bug fixes in non-deprecated library routines.