[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: ldapmodify "daemon"

Hallvard B Furuseth wrote:
> It's wrong to call it a "daemon" since it is not
> listening to a port or anything, but I don't know what else to call it.

GnuPG, or to some degree dpkg, have options --status-fd and --command-fd
which work the way you described except the file descriptors can be
specified rather than assuming stdin and stdout. I would suggest doing
it the same way.

Roland Bauerschmidt