[Date Prev][Date Next]
RE: 'Allow backup' extended operation
> I think this is a bit of overkill. One of the reasons for developing
> back-bdb was to have a backend that supports hot backups... Since this
> facility exists, and back-ldbm is no longer getting any new features
> implemented, I don't see any reason to do anything further.
Where I see room for smtg like this is in allowing the creation
of a new replica, either by regenerating from ldif or by copying
the db files; it looks a bit more kind than stop and restart
in readonly mode.