[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: extended filter
At 08:46 AM 2002-08-28, Pierangelo Masarati wrote:
>I was playing with RFC2254 extended filter, and I noticed that:
>- dn attributes are not implemented (yet); anyone working at it?
>- a matching rule and a type MUST be given (of course :), but then
>the matching rule is ignored in favour of the equality rules
>for the given type;
No. If a matching rule is provided, it is used. If
the type's default matching rule is desired, no matching
rule should be specified in the assertion.
>so what's the difference with usual filters?
>see get_mra() in servers/slapd/mra.c
>Dr. Pierangelo Masarati | voice: +39 02 2399 8309
>Dip. Ing. Aerospaziale | fax: +39 02 2399 8334
>Politecnico di Milano | mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org
>via La Masa 34, 20156 Milano, Italy | http://www.aero.polimi.it/~masarati