[Date Prev][Date Next]
RE: back-bdb quirk?
Then, it may be a db4 problem.
As I replied to Pierangelo early this month,
increasing BDB_IDL_DB_SIZE seemed to solve
the cursor open-close mismatch problem
Anyway, it's great to have the new one...
Jong Hyuk Choi
IBM Thomas J. Watson Research Center - Enterprise Linux Group
P. O. Box 218, Yorktown Heights, NY 10598
(phone) 914-945-3979 (fax) 914-945-4425 TL: 862-3979
"Howard Chu" <email@example.com> on 03/20/2002 05:08:24 PM
To: Jonghyuk Choi/Watson/IBM@IBMUS, "Pierangelo Masarati"
Subject: RE: back-bdb quirk?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jonghyuk Choi [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
> Pierangelo, increasing BDB_IDL_DB_SIZE worked in your case ?
> buf[BDB_IDL_DB_SIZE] of bdb_idl_insert_key can overflow while running
Did you actually see this occur? I never did. At any rate, the new code
in HEAD doesn't have this risk.
> Although I'm also not 100% sure whether increasing
> BDB_IDL_DB_SIZE directly
> solves the problem,
> we seem to need a better management of IDL in memory.
-- Howard Chu
Chief Architect, Symas Corp. Director, Highland Sun
Symas: Premier OpenSource Development and Support