[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: normalised UTF-8, should it be "decomposed", or "composed"?

To: Stig Venaas <Stig@OpenLDAP.org>
Subject: Re: normalised UTF-8, should it be "decomposed", or "composed"?
From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 09:48:43 -0800
Cc: Howard Chu <hyc@highlandsun.com>, John Hughes <john@Calva.COM>, "'OpenLDAP DEVEL'" <openldap-devel@OpenLDAP.org>
In-reply-to: <20020220153950.C10991@itea.ntnu.no>
References: <NMEFLNHODBAOPDKNNJALEEPJCFAA.hyc@highlandsun.com> <NMEFLNHODBAOPDKNNJALEEPICFAA.hyc@highlandsun.com> <NMEFLNHODBAOPDKNNJALEEPJCFAA.hyc@highlandsun.com>

At 06:39 AM 2002-02-20, Stig Venaas wrote:
>then strip 8-bit characters

I think we should NOT strip 8-bit characters (when doing
approximate matching).

Follow-Ups:
- Re: normalised UTF-8, should it be "decomposed", or "composed"?
  - From: Stig Venaas <Stig.Venaas@uninett.no>

References:
- RE: normalised UTF-8, should it be "decomposed", or "composed"?
  - From: "Howard Chu" <hyc@highlandsun.com>
- RE: normalised UTF-8, should it be "decomposed", or "composed"?
  - From: "Howard Chu" <hyc@highlandsun.com>
- Re: normalised UTF-8, should it be "decomposed", or "composed"?
  - From: Stig Venaas <Stig@OpenLDAP.org>

Prev by Date: RE : normalised UTF-8, should it be "decomposed", or "composed"?
Next by Date: Re: storing security info in ldap
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread