[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: is_object_subclass()

At 11:42 AM 2002-02-09, Luke Howard wrote:
>Arguments are misleading; it appears to test whether the second argument
>is a subclass of the first, because it chases the superclass hierarchy.
>int is_object_subclass(
>    ObjectClass *sub,
>    ObjectClass *sup );
>Am I correct or confused?

Looks like they are reversed, as well as two calls in aclparse.c.
In testing, I found and fixed another bug (w/ objectClass matching).