[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: back-bdb deadlocks
> I've cleaned things up and recompiled/linked with BDB 4.0.14 (was using 3.3.11)
> and the same deadlock occurs in txn_abort. You're right, this sounds like a bug
> for Sleepycat to address. I cannot find any code path that bdb_add executes
> without a transaction, so it appears we're doing the right things.
Where in __txn_abort does it lock up exactly?
When everything comes your way, you're in the wrong lane.