[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: back-bdb deadlocks
From: "Howard Chu" <email@example.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 19:36:01 -0800
I've cleaned things up and recompiled/linked with BDB 4.0.14 (was
using 3.3.11) and the same deadlock occurs in txn_abort. You're
right, this sounds like a bug for Sleepycat to address. I cannot
find any code path that bdb_add executes without a transaction, so
it appears we're doing the right things.
It might be worthwhile to try to write a small program that
demonstrates this instead of relying on all of OpenLDAP.