On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 09:19:55PM +1100, Luke Howard wrote: > > This looks great -- the only point I would make is, yes, I > would avoid using C++ and, you might wish to look at how Agree, looks great and avoid C++... I would like to dynamically extend ACLs, syntaxes and matching rules. All that is possible with this API, right? I welcome this anyway, Stig