[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: Substring searches
"Kurt D. Zeilenga" wrote:
> I don't think fine grained controls is not the answer. Consider:
> Why should the search fail just because one component of the
> filter has a large number of candidates? Even where
> each had large number of candidates, the intersection may
> actually be quite small. What matters is how many candidates
> the whole filter has and that's what the HEAD code limits.
> Why is more needed?
I agree your example really tricks this feature into an undesired
behavior. That's why I'm still doubting about its usefulness.
Dr. Pierangelo Masarati | voice: +39 02 2399 8309
Dip. Ing. Aerospaziale | fax: +39 02 2399 8334
Politecnico di Milano | mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org
via La Masa 34, 20156 Milano, Italy |