[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Substring searches

"Kurt D. Zeilenga" wrote:
> I don't think fine grained controls is not the answer.  Consider:
>         (&(cn=*ab*)(objectClass=person)(name=Bob))
> Why should the search fail just because one component of the
> filter has a large number of candidates?  Even where
> each had large number of candidates, the intersection may
> actually be quite small.  What matters is how many candidates
> the whole filter has and that's what the HEAD code limits.
> Why is more needed?

I agree your example really tricks this feature into an undesired 
behavior. That's why I'm still doubting about its usefulness.


Dr. Pierangelo Masarati               | voice: +39 02 2399 8309
Dip. Ing. Aerospaziale                | fax:   +39 02 2399 8334
Politecnico di Milano                 | mailto:masarati@aero.polimi.it
via La Masa 34, 20156 Milano, Italy   |