[Date Prev][Date Next]
At 08:55 AM 2001-10-15, Marijn Meijles wrote:
>> the conversion from database format to in-memory format should
>> be significantly less than that in back-ldbm. back-ldbm
>> uses LDIF in id2entry, back-bdb uses BER. Optimizing
>> BER and memory management will shift the balance further.
>yup. with ldif format it's definitely faster, I did some profiling on that.
Numbers would be great....
>Have you already thought about what kind of cache you want to use?
BTW, any help completing back-bdb would be appreciated. I'm
swamped with other things at the moment and will likely not
revisit the code for a few weeks.