[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: back-bdb

At 08:55 AM 2001-10-15, Marijn Meijles wrote:
>> the conversion from database format to in-memory format should
>> be significantly less than that in back-ldbm.  back-ldbm
>> uses LDIF in id2entry, back-bdb uses BER.  Optimizing
>> BER and memory management will shift the balance further.
>yup. with ldif format it's definitely faster, I did some profiling on that.

Numbers would be great....

>Have you already thought about what kind of cache you want to use?

Not yet.

BTW, any help completing back-bdb would be appreciated.  I'm
swamped with other things at the moment and will likely not
revisit the code for a few weeks.