[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Characters in DN

To: david.cooper@nist.gov
Subject: Re: Characters in DN
From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 15:28:47 -0700
Cc: Pierangelo Masarati <masarati@aero.polimi.it>, OpenLDAP Devel <openldap-devel@OpenLDAP.org>
In-reply-to: <01071117371800.01662@st26>
References: <3B4BEE89.31B1C53D@aero.polimi.it> <4.2.2.20010710084542.00a61100@email.nist.gov> <4.2.2.20010710162121.00b8e510@email.nist.gov> <3B4BEE89.31B1C53D@aero.polimi.it>

At 02:37 PM 7/11/2001, David A. Cooper wrote:
>Actually, RFC 2253 isn't entirely clear on this issue.

See draft-ietf-ldapbis-dn-xx.txt (available from IETF).  It
should be quite clear as to what's expected.  This I-D is
the LDAPbis WG proposed replacement for RFC 2253.

Kurt

References:
- Re: Characters in DN
  - From: Pierangelo Masarati <masarati@aero.polimi.it>
- Re: Characters in DN
  - From: "David A. Cooper" <david.cooper@nist.gov>
- Re: Characters in DN
  - From: "David A. Cooper" <david.cooper@nist.gov>
- Re: Characters in DN
  - From: "David A. Cooper" <david.cooper@nist.gov>

Prev by Date: Re: Characters in DN
Next by Date: Public ldap Server
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread