[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Duplicate entries

Pierangelo Masarati wrote:
> but in my opinion it may be leaky. In back-ldbm/add.c there's a call to
> dn2id with the ndn of the entry being added, to check if it's already
> there. This function, in case the dn2id.dbX file cannot be opened,
> returnd NOID, which is the magic number ldbm_back_add expects to
> start adding the entry. I think the error code should be separated
> from the output of the routine. Is it OK if I go ahead or is anybody
> playing with that code yet?

I'm about to commit this change. I think it doesn't hurt anything
in the HEAD code (hopefully). Please feedback.


Dr. Pierangelo Masarati    mailto:ando@sys-net.it
Developer, SysNet s.n.c.   http://www.sys-net.it