[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: SLAPD: Should access checks take place before filter matching?

To: Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
Subject: Re: SLAPD: Should access checks take place before filter matching?
From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 13:57:48 -0700
Cc: <openldap-devel@OpenLDAP.org>
In-reply-to: <5.1.0.14.0.20010622132523.00ae55a0@127.0.0.1>
References: <Pine.OSX.4.33.0106221514400.1652-100000@k-hole.ibiblio.org > <5.1.0.14.0.20010622114136.02ee75d0@127.0.0.1>

For clarity:

current code:

userPassword	filter				result
secret		(userPassword=secret)		Undefined
secret		(!(userPassword=secret))	Undefined
notsecret	(userPassword=secret)		Undefined
notsecret	(!(userPassword=secret))	Undefined

suggested code:

userPassword	filter				result
secret		(userPassword=secret)		Undefined
secret		(!(userPassword=secret))	Undefined
notsecret	(userPassword=secret)		False
notsecret	(!(userPassword=secret))	True

References:
- Re: SLAPD: Should access checks take place before filter matching?
  - From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
- Re: SLAPD: Should access checks take place before filter matching?
  - From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>

Prev by Date: Re: SLAPD: Should access checks take place before filter matching?
Next by Date: Re: SLAPD: Should access checks take place before filter matching?
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread