[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: New logging

Gary Williams wrote:

> Kurt and others,
> Feedback is encouraged, but I'm primarily
> interested in (in order of importance): 1) I haven't broken anything
> 2) everything works as intended 3) the mechanism is sufficiently
> extensible and useful.  I realize that if the new logging is accepted,
> a lot of work can go into actually putting more logging messages into
> the code, but this can be an evolutionary process.  Thank you for your
> cooperation and support.

It looks pretty nice, I'll be pleased to try it out. If everybody agrees,
like to contribute in putting the new logging stuff in back-ldap, as I've

been doing some changes in the module, and more are to come in the
near future.
Another possibly related point is: what about a means, e.g. signals or
some OpenLDAP extension to the protocol, to allow run-time
log-level tuning without having to restart the server? Has anybody
ever thought about it?

Bye, Pierangelo.

Dr. Pierangelo Masarati               | voice: +39 02 2399 8365
Dip. Ing. Aerospaziale                | fax:   +39 02 2399 8334
Politecnico di Milano                 | mailto:masarati@aero.polimi.it
via La Masa 34, 20156 Milano, Italy   | http://www.aero.polimi.it/~masarati