[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Bump up LIBVERSION?

To: "Julio [S_nchez Fern_ndez]" <j_sanchez@stl.es>
Subject: Re: Bump up LIBVERSION?
From: kunkee@neosoft.com (Randy Kunkee)
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 10:49:25 -0500 (CDT)
Cc: openldap-devel@OpenLDAP.org
In-reply-to: <396D7173.60E4AB7B@stl.es> from "Julio [S_nchez Fern_ndez]" at "Jul 13, 2000 09:36:19 am"

Sounds like an excellent idea to me.

Randy

> 
> We currently set LIBVERSION to 0:0:0.  This means that the
> installed share libraries get names like libldap.so.0.0.0.  These
> numbers don't look nice.  We should change them to something else.
> 
> At least RedHat have been distributing openldap packages with
> version 1.0.0 in libraries.
> 
> I propose that we declare that library major version 1 is for
> Umich-compatible APIs and that OpenLDAP 2.0, implementing the
> new API based on the I-D (where ld is an opaque structure, etc.).
> gets a library major version of 2.
> 
> In consequence, I propose that we set LIBVERSION to 2:0:0 in
> build/top.mk in the HEAD branch, effective immediately.
> 
> Comments?
> 
> Julio
>

References:
- Bump up LIBVERSION?
  - From: Julio Sánchez Fernández <j_sanchez@stl.es>

Prev by Date: Bump up LIBVERSION?
Next by Date: Re: Bump up LIBVERSION?
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread