[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: __NEED_PROTOTYPES vs. LDAP_NEED_PROTOTYPES
At 02:40 PM 6/19/00 -0500, Randy Kunkee wrote:
>I just checked out a fresh head branch on another machine to give Mark
>access to testing the kill-the-daemon-race problem. The compiler stopped
>on schemaparse.c, with an error dscompare()'s types. The problem seems
>to stem from a
> #define __NEED_PROTOTYPES 1
>in portable.h vs.
> #ifdef ... LDAP_NEED_PROTOTYPES
>My other checkout, on another machine, where I've been using 'cvs update'
>also now seems to be headed towards this problem. Which is the real one?
>__NEED_PROTOTYPES or LDAP_NEED_PROTOTYPES?
LDAP_NEEDS_PROTOTYPES... will fix.