[Date Prev][Date Next]
In private e-mail "Kurt D. Zeilenga" wrote:
BTW, I've gutted the LDAPaci attributes and swapped in
OpenLDAPaci. Feel free to design a ACI syntax which
"makes sense" from a OpenLDAP perspective... best if
looks nothing like LDAPaci's (which is disaster, IMO).
The LDAPaci syntax is ugly, sure, but the code works. My feeling is
that the aci's would be constructed by software, so they don't have
to be easy for people to read (although they are not that bad).
Still, there is alot of redundancy (stemming from too much
flexibility) in the current syntax. What were your concerns?
I welcome anyone's comments on the ACI syntax. I'll be in that code
again, so if changes are needed/requested, now's the time.