[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Distinguished name ++ (continued)

To: Frédéric Poels <fpo@atos.be>
Subject: Re: Distinguished name ++ (continued)
From: Hallvard B Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no>
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1999 17:22:09 +0200
Cc: OpenLDAP-devel@OpenLDAP.org
In-reply-to: <3.0.6.32.19990824163252.00922720@mail>
References: <3.0.6.32.19990824145813.00915e20@mail> <HBF.990824nx5k@bombur.uio.no> <3.0.6.32.19990824163252.00922720@mail>

Frédéric Poels writes:
> Adding nod=TEST+++ works with openLDAP 1.3.6 but does not work with
> OpenLDAP 2.0-alpha2. Is it normal?

Yes: It's normal for programs to have insufficient error checking (as in
1.3.6), and it's normal that later versions improve on it somewhat:-)

-- 
Hallvard

References:
- Distinguished name ++ (continued)
  - From: Frédéric Poels <fpo@atos.be>
- Re: Distinguished name ++ (continued)
  - From: Hallvard B Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no>
- Re: Distinguished name ++ (continued)
  - From: Frédéric Poels <fpo@atos.be>

Prev by Date: Re: Distinguished name ++ (continued)
Next by Date: Re: Distinguished name ++ (continued)
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread