[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: Using LDAP for mail distribution
"Kurt D. Zeilenga" wrote:
> I, for one, would love to see mail500 be enhanced. I think
> handling ldap lookups in the local delivery agent offers
> some benefits not found in sendmail's built in ldapx lookup
I find sendmail ldapx useless. Does not meet any of my needs.
Latest versions can be used for alias expansion, but that's as
far as it gets.
> You might consider using ldap_init_getfilter(3) and friends
> as a mechanism for externalizing the configuration of filters.
Well, it sort of breaks the concept of using LDAP URLs. I'll see
if I can overload the filter field in them to specify that the
ldapfilter.conf file has to be used and a tag to use. This way
different tags can be used on different search bases.
> I'm also interested in implementing "MajorLDAP"... a fully
> featured, directory-enabled mailing list manager.
I think the current functionality when complemented with the
semantics needed to support Netscape's mailGroup can get close to
the functionality needed by a general purpose MLM. Unless I am
> I'd be happy to review your changes.
The hard part is keeping compatibility with the current stuff, first
versions will probably break some of the more exotic parts. Should
I upload to incoming when I have something (full source? patch?)
or should I create a branch on CVS?