[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: New schema

At 12:29 PM 4/30/99 +0200, Julio Sánchez Fernández wrote:
>"Kurt D. Zeilenga" wrote:
>> I think we should treat NADF schema as "optional" or
>> "contributed" schema for now.  I'd leave creation of
>> nadf.schema for later.
>I think you mean commitment to CVS, not creation.

No, I meant "creation."  If you've already created, go ahead
and commit it.  We'll sort how to categories later.

>> I'm thinking we should create a "core.schema" that includes
>> all items who's use is detailed in RFC2251-RFC2256 plus
>> RFC2247 and RFC2377 plus OpenLDAP-specific "core" items.
>> Any dependent items described elsewhere would also be
>> included.
>I'll start moving in that direction.  Should we allocate
>a number under for 'schema' and a number
>of suballocations for objectclasses and attributetypes?

We need to come up with decent OID numbering schema.
More on this later.