[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: New schema
At 12:29 PM 4/30/99 +0200, Julio Sánchez Fernández wrote:
>"Kurt D. Zeilenga" wrote:
>> I think we should treat NADF schema as "optional" or
>> "contributed" schema for now. I'd leave creation of
>> nadf.schema for later.
>I think you mean commitment to CVS, not creation.
No, I meant "creation." If you've already created, go ahead
and commit it. We'll sort how to categories later.
>> I'm thinking we should create a "core.schema" that includes
>> all items who's use is detailed in RFC2251-RFC2256 plus
>> RFC2247 and RFC2377 plus OpenLDAP-specific "core" items.
>> Any dependent items described elsewhere would also be
>I'll start moving in that direction. Should we allocate
>a number under 22.214.171.124.4.1.4203 for 'schema' and a number
>of suballocations for objectclasses and attributetypes?
We need to come up with decent OID numbering schema.
More on this later.